“They” know this. We know this. Our content is a product worth monetizing, otherwise the spam would stop, and the ads would not spook us so much. But it’s our data points that are the headliners, even if the content deserves rotten tomatoes.
Some thoughts: Does better quality content translate into better quality spam? How much content is too much, and how can that be measured before it becomes too much? What are good strategies to protect content from bad actors? Are we giving too much away?
Very interesting John. I don't thing there is such a thing like "too much contents", otherwise Libraries would be some kind of hell on earth.
The problem is the obstacle you need to climb over only to search, find and access the content you want to consume. There is no metric for the good a content may create in the people who consume it other than the quantity of views/reads/likes.